Paff v. Margerum
142 A. 6, 103 N.J. Eq. 74, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 637
This text of 142 A. 6 (Paff v. Margerum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Paff v. Margerum, 142 A. 6, 103 N.J. Eq. 74, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 637 (N.J. 1928).
Opinion
The decree-order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None. *Page 78
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Frisch v. Rutgers Village
73 A.2d 83 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Wickwire v. Church
59 A.2d 416 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Majeski v. Stuyvesant Homes, Inc.
55 A.2d 33 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Bright v. Forest Hill Park Development Co.
31 A.2d 190 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Stanley-Fabian Corp. v. H.J. Theatrical, C., Co.
169 A. 291 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
142 A. 6, 103 N.J. Eq. 74, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paff-v-margerum-nj-1928.