Paff v. Margerum
142 A. 6, 103 N.J. Eq. 74, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 637
Opinion
The decree-order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None. *Page 78
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paff v. Margerum, 142 A. 6, 103 N.J. Eq. 74, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 637 (N.J. 1928).
142 A. 6 (Paff v. Margerum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frisch v. Rutgers Village
73 A.2d 83 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Wickwire v. Church
59 A.2d 416 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Majeski v. Stuyvesant Homes, Inc.
55 A.2d 33 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Bright v. Forest Hill Park Development Co.
31 A.2d 190 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Stanley-Fabian Corp. v. H.J. Theatrical, C., Co.
169 A. 291 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)