PAF-PAR LLC v. Silberberg

48 N.E.3d 960, 27 N.Y.3d 930

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 24, 2016·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. In this action pursuant to CPLR 3213, PAF-PAR LLC failed to demonstrate standing to maintain the action.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PAF-PAR LLC v. Silberberg, 48 N.E.3d 960, 27 N.Y.3d 930 (N.Y. 2016).

Pincite

48 N.E.3d 960 (PAF-PAR LLC v. Silberberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.