PAF-PAR LLC v. Michael Silberberg

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 24, 2016
Docket42
StatusPublished

This text of PAF-PAR LLC v. Michael Silberberg (PAF-PAR LLC v. Michael Silberberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PAF-PAR LLC v. Michael Silberberg, (N.Y. 2016).

Opinion

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 42 PAF-PAR LLC, Appellant, v. Michael Silberberg, et al., Respondents.

William L. Charron, for appellant. Vincent J. Syracuse, for respondents.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order affirmed, with costs. In this action pursuant to CPLR 3213, PAF-PAR LLC failed to demonstrate standing to maintain the action. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Decided March 24, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
PAF-PAR LLC v. Michael Silberberg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paf-par-llc-v-michael-silberberg-ny-2016.