Padula v. Romano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Padula v. Romano

29 A.D.2d 770, 288 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4707

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 13, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 770 (Padula v. Romano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Padula v. Romano, 29 A.D.2d 770, 288 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County*- dated September 27, 1967, affirmed, without costs. Although we are affirming the order denying severance of the third-party action, we suggest that trial of the actions be adjourned for a reasonable period so as to afford appellant a full opportunity to complete all pretrial examinations and preparations for trial (Kaplan v. Walton, 28 A D 2d 1140). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin a and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County*- dated September 27, 1967, affirmed, without costs. Although we are affirming the order denying severance of the third-party action, we suggest that trial of the actions be adjourned for a reasonable period so as to afford appellant a full opportunity to complete all pretrial examinations and preparations for trial (Kaplan v. Walton, 28 A D 2d 1140). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin a and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 770, 288 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padula-v-romano-nyappdiv-1968.