Padron v. State

96 So. 3d 1041, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13907, 2012 WL 3586861
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 22, 2012
DocketNo. 3D12-1100
StatusPublished

This text of 96 So. 3d 1041 (Padron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Padron v. State, 96 So. 3d 1041, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13907, 2012 WL 3586861 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

SUAREZ, J.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), (D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 3d 1041, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13907, 2012 WL 3586861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padron-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.