Padron v. State

553 So. 2d 281, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2760, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6664, 1989 WL 142673
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 28, 1989·No. No. 88-2646·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant, Hector Padrón, appeals a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the order of the trial court based upon the finding that appellant’s motion was insufficient on its face. Robinson v. State, 516 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Finney v. State, 502 So.2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Tedder v. State, 495 So.2d 276 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Williams v. State, 418 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Padron v. State, 553 So. 2d 281, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2760, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6664, 1989 WL 142673 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

553 So. 2d 281 (Padron v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
516 So. 2d 20 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Tedder v. State
495 So. 2d 276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Williams v. State
418 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Finney v. State
502 So. 2d 519 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)