Padron v. Lima

569 So. 2d 805, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7856, 1990 WL 154999
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1990·No. No. 90-856·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cohen v. Schrider, 533 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Cam, 473 So.2d 742 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Cabals v. Elkins, 368 So.2d 96 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Schatz v. 7 Eleven, Inc., 128 So.2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Padron v. Lima, 569 So. 2d 805, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7856, 1990 WL 154999 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

569 So. 2d 805 (Padron v. Lima) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Carn
473 So. 2d 742 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Cohen v. Schrider
533 So. 2d 859 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Cabals v. Elkins
368 So. 2d 96 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Schatz v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
128 So. 2d 901 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)