Padro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Padro v. State

428 So. 2d 290, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20261

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 15, 1983

DocketNo. 82-86

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 428 So. 2d 290 (Padro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Padro v. State, 428 So. 2d 290, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20261 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that defendant Padro’s extrajudicial statement denying criminal responsibility constituted an admission from which [291]*291guilt might be inferred rather than a confession, that his statement was therefore admissible prior to the establishment of the corpus delicti, Nelson v. State, 372 So.2d 949 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), and that his remaining points lack merit, we affirm the conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Finding that defendant Padro’s extrajudicial statement denying criminal responsibility constituted an admission from which [291]*291guilt might be inferred rather than a confession, that his statement was therefore admissible prior to the establishment of the corpus delicti, Nelson v. State, 372 So.2d 949 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), and that his remaining points lack merit, we affirm the conviction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

428 So. 2d 290, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padro-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack