Padro v. State
428 So. 2d 290, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20261
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 1983·No. No. 82-86·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Finding that defendant Padro’s extrajudicial statement denying criminal responsibility constituted an admission from which [291] guilt might be inferred rather than a confession, that his statement was therefore admissible prior to the establishment of the corpus delicti, Nelson v. State, 372 So.2d 949 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), and that his remaining points lack merit, we affirm the conviction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Padro v. State, 428 So. 2d 290, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20261 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
428 So. 2d 290 (Padro v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
582 So. 2d 695 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Moore v. State
530 So. 2d 61 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Fridovich v. State
489 So. 2d 143 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)