Padney v. Metrohealth Med. Ctr.

Ohio Supreme Court

Padney v. Metrohealth Med. Ctr.

713 N.E.2d 430, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1429, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2623

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 28, 1999

Docket99-1104

StatusPublished

This text of 713 N.E.2d 430 (Padney v. Metrohealth Med. Ctr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Padney v. Metrohealth Med. Ctr., 713 N.E.2d 430, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1429, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2623 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 76276. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. On July 19,1999, appellant filed a motion to strike appellees’ memorandum in response. It appearing to the court that the motion to strike is, in substance, a reply memorandum and, whereas, S.Ct.Prac.R. 111(3) prohibits the filing of reply memoranda,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s motion to strike be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 76276. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. On July 19,1999, appellant filed a motion to strike appellees’ memorandum in response. It appearing to the court that the motion to strike is, in substance, a reply memorandum and, whereas, S.Ct.Prac.R. 111(3) prohibits the filing of reply memoranda,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s motion to strike be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

713 N.E.2d 430, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1429, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padney-v-metrohealth-med-ctr-ohio-1999.