Padlo v. Spoor
This text of 72 A.D.2d 665 (Padlo v. Spoor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs on the opinion at Special Term, Bayger, J. (See, also, Plath v Justus, 28 NY2d 16; Winnick v Kupperman Constr. Co., 29 AD2d 261; Restatement Agency 2d, §217, subd [b], par [ii].) (Appeal from order of Niagara Supreme Court—dismiss complaint.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Witmer, JJ. [90 Misc 2d 1002.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 A.D.2d 665, 422 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padlo-v-spoor-nyappdiv-1979.