Padillo v. State
86 S.W.2d 772, 129 Tex. Crim. 265, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 441
Opinions
The conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen property; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
We are unable to pass upon the case further than to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the record fails to show notice of appeal, which is essential to give this court jurisdiction of the appeal. See Art. 827, C. C. P. The statute is emphasized by many decisions of this court which will be found in the reports.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Padillo v. State, 86 S.W.2d 772, 129 Tex. Crim. 265, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 441 (Tex. 1935).
86 S.W.2d 772 (Padillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shelby v. State
137 S.W.2d 1021 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)