Padilla v. Vindel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Padilla v. Vindel

132 So. 3d 378, 2014 WL 537512, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1835

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 2014·No. No. 4D12-4156·Published

Opinion

DAMOORGIAN, C.J.

Appellant, Marina Yadira Padilla, appeals the trial court’s final order dismissing her petition for dissolution of marriage for lack of jurisdiction. We reverse because the record before us established that the Appellant resided in the state six months before the filing of the petition as required by section 61.021, Florida Statutes (2012). See Rudel v. Rudel, 111 So.3d 285, 290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Reversed.

GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAMOORGIAN, C.J.

Appellant, Marina Yadira Padilla, appeals the trial court’s final order dismissing her petition for dissolution of marriage for lack of jurisdiction. We reverse because the record before us established that the Appellant resided in the state six months before the filing of the petition as required by section 61.021, Florida Statutes (2012). See Rudel v. Rudel, 111 So.3d 285, 290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Reversed.

GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Padilla v. Vindel, 132 So. 3d 378, 2014 WL 537512, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1835 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

132 So. 3d 378 (Padilla v. Vindel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related