Padilla v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 YOLANY PADILLA, IBIS GUZMAN, CASE NO. C18-928 MJP BLANCA ORANTES, BALTAZAR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND 12 Plaintiffs-Petitioners, DIRECTING FILING OF JOINT STATUS REPORT 13 v. ENFORCEMENT, et al., 15 Defendants-Respondents. 16 17 18 The Court issues this Order in light of the Ninth Circuit’s Order and Mandate. (Dkt. No. 19 182.) The Ninth Circuit’s Order directs the Court “to vacate the preliminary injunction and for 20 further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Biden v. Texas, 142 S. Ct. 21 2528 (2022), Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez, 142 S. Ct. 2057 (2022), and Department of 22 Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (2020).” The Court therefore VACATES 23 the preliminary injunction. (Dkt. No. 110.) 24 1 The Court further ORDERS the Parties to meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report 2 setting forth the Parties’ respective positions as to what briefing they would like to file to address 3 the authority cited by the Ninth Circuit’s Order and the Parties’ proposed trial date and case 4 deadlines that the Court should set. The Court urges the Parties to reach agreement on any

5 proposed briefing and case deadlines, as well as a trial date. The Joint Status Report must be 6 filed by no later than August 19, 2022. 7 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. 8 Dated July 29, 2022. A 9 10 Marsha J. Pechman United States Senior District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24