Padilla v. Savo Contracting Corp.

211 A.D.2d 508, 622 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 391
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Levy, J.), entered July 19, 1993, which reduced the jury verdict in favor of plaintiff of, inter alia, $270,000 for past pain and suffering and $1.5 million for future pain and suffering to $150,000 and $350,000, respectively, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to reinstate the jury verdict as to past pain and suffering and to order a new trial solely on the issue of damages for future pain and suffering, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon his attorney of a copy of this order, stipulates in writing to the entry of a judgment reducing his award for future pain and suffering to $1 million, in which event the order, as so amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We find the damages for past and future pain and suffering as reduced by the trial court to be inadequate to the extent [509]*509indicated. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Padilla v. Savo Contracting Corp., 211 A.D.2d 508, 622 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

211 A.D.2d 508 (Padilla v. Savo Contracting Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. Hanslmaier
982 F. Supp. 279 (S.D. New York, 1997)