Padilla v. Priest

543 F. App'x 353
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 23, 2013
DocketNo. 13-1830
StatusPublished

This text of 543 F. App'x 353 (Padilla v. Priest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Padilla v. Priest, 543 F. App'x 353 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Victor L. Padilla appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Padilla v. Priest, No. 1:13-cv-00287-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. filed June 25, 2013, and entered June 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 F. App'x 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padilla-v-priest-ca4-2013.