Padilla v. Priest

Fourth Circuit

Padilla v. Priest

543 F. App'x 353

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2013·No. No. 13-1830·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Victor L. Padilla appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Padilla v. Priest, No. 1:13-cv-00287-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. filed June 25, 2013, and entered June 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Victor L. Padilla appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Padilla v. Priest, No. 1:13-cv-00287-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. filed June 25, 2013, and entered June 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Padilla v. Priest, 543 F. App'x 353 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

543 F. App'x 353 (Padilla v. Priest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.