Padilla v. Palmateer

56 P.3d 964, 184 Or. App. 756, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1731
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 6, 2002
Docket00C-12660; A114687
StatusPublished

This text of 56 P.3d 964 (Padilla v. Palmateer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Padilla v. Palmateer, 56 P.3d 964, 184 Or. App. 756, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1731 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Teague v. Palmateer, 184 Or App 577, 57 P3d 176 (2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Teague v. Palmateer
57 P.3d 176 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 P.3d 964, 184 Or. App. 756, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padilla-v-palmateer-orctapp-2002.