Padilla v. Immigration

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN COVARRUBIAS PADILLA, Case No. 1:25-cv-00221 JLT EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 13 v. ACTION WITH PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO 14 IMMIGRATION, et al., CLOSE THIS CASE 15 Defendants. (Doc. 12) 16 17 Juan Covarrubias alleges a conspiracy by defendants to cause him harm, including 18 assertions that devices were implanted inside his body. (See generally Doc. 1.) On February 27, 19 2025, the assigned magistrate judge found plaintiff’s allegations to be frivolous and 20 recommended dismissing the case with prejudice and without leave to amend. (Doc. 12 at 5.) 21 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on plaintiff and notified him that any 22 objections were due within 30 days. (Id.) The Court advised plaintiff that the “failure to file 23 objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id. at 6, citing 24 Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff has filed no objections, 25 and the time to do so has expired. 26 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. 27 Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations 28 are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued February 27, 2025 (Doc. 12) are 2 ADOPTED in full. 3 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend as frivolous. 4 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: _ April 18, 2025 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28