Padilla v. Holder

372 F. App'x 698
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 24, 2010
Docket07-72261
StatusUnpublished

This text of 372 F. App'x 698 (Padilla v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Padilla v. Holder, 372 F. App'x 698 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Armando Padilla, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of *699 the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, 468 F.3d 1159, 1163 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Padilla’s contention that his conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes section 13-3415 is not a crime relating to a controlled substance under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) is foreclosed. See Luu-Le v. INS, 224 F.3d 911, 916 (9th Cir.2000); see also Ruiz-Vidal v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 1072, 1077 n. 5 (9th Cir.2007).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 F. App'x 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padilla-v-holder-ca9-2010.