Padilla v. Concord Plastics, Inc.
551 A.2d 534, 113 N.J. 508, 1988 N.J. LEXIS 119
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 221 N.J.Super. 301 (1987).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN join in this opinion.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Padilla v. Concord Plastics, Inc., 551 A.2d 534, 113 N.J. 508, 1988 N.J. LEXIS 119 (N.J. 1988).
551 A.2d 534 (Padilla v. Concord Plastics, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Padilla v. Concord Plastics, Inc.
534 A.2d 428 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)