Padilla v. Brawn
This text of 648 N.E.2d 790 (Padilla v. Brawn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it is treated as seeking reargument of the motion for leave to appeal dismissed by this Court’s order dated September 27, 1994, denied [see, 84 NY2d 864]; motion, insofar as it is treated as seeking leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dated November 4, 1994, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks other relief, denied.
Judge Smith taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
648 N.E.2d 790, 85 N.Y.2d 855, 624 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padilla-v-brawn-ny-1995.