Padilla v. Blue Cloud Investment Holdings LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 7, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-00292·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 VERONICA PADILLA, No. 1:24-cv-00292-KES-SKO

12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE HOLDINGS LLC, (Doc. 21) 15 Defendant. 16 17 On March 7, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 18 (Doc. 21.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 20 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: March 7, 2025 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Padilla v. Blue Cloud Investment Holdings LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Padilla v. Blue Cloud Investment Holdings LLC (Padilla v. Blue Cloud Investment Holdings LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)