Padilla (Raymond) Vs. Warden
This text of Padilla (Raymond) Vs. Warden (Padilla (Raymond) Vs. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RAYMOND GEAN PADILLA, No. 79969 Appellant, VS.
BRIAN WILLIAMS, WARDEN, FILED Respondent. DEC O 9 2019 ( BROWN REME COURT BY ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no decision had been made on the petition when appellant filed the notice of appeal on October 30, 2019.1 Thus, the notice of appeal is premature. See NRS 177.015(3) (stating that a defendant only may appeal from a final judgment or verdict). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
, J. Hardesty
"Of/AisCea.fi 1/41Z4a0 , J. Stiglich Silver
IThe district court orally denied the petition on October 17, 2019. However, on November 26, 2019, the district court continued the matter to January 7, 2020. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A AN. /1- tills-tv III Mak cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Raymond Gean Padilla Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A 2 Mai i BALI
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Padilla (Raymond) Vs. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padilla-raymond-vs-warden-nev-2019.