Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Padgett v. State

Padgett v. State

168 S.E. 53, 176 Ga. 314, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 65
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 20, 1933
DocketNo. 8958
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 S.E. 53 (Padgett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Padgett v. State, 168 S.E. 53, 176 Ga. 314, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 65 (Ga. 1933).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

1. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

2. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial do not show such error as requires a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial.

3. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., not participating, and Russell, O. J., and Bell, J., who dissent. E. K. Wilcox and Copeland, & Dulces, for plaintiff in error. George M. Napier, attorney-general, G. 0. Spurlin, solicitor-general, T. B. Gress, assistant attorney-general, E. A. Sephens, and L. C. Bussell, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. State
60 S.E.2d 169 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Welch v. State
175 S.E. 598 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 S.E. 53, 176 Ga. 314, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padgett-v-state-ga-1933.