Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Padgett v. State

Padgett v. State

168 S.E. 53, 176 Ga. 314, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 65
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 20, 1933·No. No. 8958·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

1. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

2. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial do not show such error as requires a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial.

3. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., not participating, and Russell, O. J., and Bell, J., who dissent. E. K. Wilcox and Copeland, & Dulces, for plaintiff in error. George M. Napier, attorney-general, G. 0. Spurlin, solicitor-general, T. B. Gress, assistant attorney-general, E. A. Sephens, and L. C. Bussell, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Padgett v. State, 168 S.E. 53, 176 Ga. 314, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 65 (Ga. 1933).

168 S.E. 53 (Padgett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campbell v. State
60 S.E.2d 169 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Welch v. State
175 S.E. 598 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)