Padgett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Padgett v. State

704 So. 2d 744, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 560, 1998 WL 25460

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 27, 1998

DocketNo. 96-4740

StatusPublished

This text of 704 So. 2d 744 (Padgett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Padgett v. State, 704 So. 2d 744, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 560, 1998 WL 25460 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Davis v. State, Case No. 96-8753, 704 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec.18, 1997)(holding that discrepancy between oral pronouncement and written order of revocation of community control is not properly preserved for appeal under section 944.051, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), where issue is not first raised at trial court level and where no prejudicial error has been demonstrated).

MICKLE, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Davis v. State, Case No. 96-8753, 704 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec.18, 1997)(holding that discrepancy between oral pronouncement and written order of revocation of community control is not properly preserved for appeal under section 944.051, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), where issue is not first raised at trial court level and where no prejudicial error has been demonstrated).

MICKLE, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

704 So. 2d 744, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 560, 1998 WL 25460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padgett-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack