Padgett v. State

116 So. 18, 95 Fla. 131
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 5, 1928
StatusPublished

This text of 116 So. 18 (Padgett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Padgett v. State, 116 So. 18, 95 Fla. 131 (Fla. 1928).

Opinions

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice STRUM are of opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of opinion that the judgment should be reversed. The judgment being for capital punishment and the members of the Court being evenly divided in opinion as to the judgment to be here rendered, all agree that in view of the serious nature of the cause and the difference in opinion being merely on the fact of the disqualification of a juror having been sufficiently shown by the record, the substantial justice of the case requires that the judgment be reversed for a new trial and it is so ordered.

Reversed for a new trial.

ELLIS, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, TERRELL, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walsingham v. State
61 Fla. 67 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1911)
Young v. State
96 So. 381 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 So. 18, 95 Fla. 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padgett-v-state-fla-1928.