Padgett v. Silver Lake Park Corp.

149 S.E. 179, 40 Ga. App. 199, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 84
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 31, 1929
Docket19110
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 S.E. 179 (Padgett v. Silver Lake Park Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Padgett v. Silver Lake Park Corp., 149 S.E. 179, 40 Ga. App. 199, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 84 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. “Under the act of 1925 (Ga. L. 1925, p. 325, as amended by the act of 1927, Ga. L. 1927, p. 307), a person acting as real-estate broker in the County of Eulton, who has failed to obtain a license from the Georgia real-estate commission, as required by that act, is precluded by such failure from recovering compensation under a contract for services rendered in procuring a sale of real estate.”

2. The above-stated ruling is the headnote of the decision of the Supreme Court in this case, rendered in answer to a question of law certified by this court (168 Ga. 759, 149 S. E. 180); and under that ruling and the facts of the instant case, the court properly awarded a nonsuit and dismissed the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., eonour.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Frazier
173 S.E.2d 434 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 S.E. 179, 40 Ga. App. 199, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padgett-v-silver-lake-park-corp-gactapp-1929.