Padgett v. Padgett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Padgett v. Padgett

13 S.E.2d 40, 64 Ga. App. 263, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 1

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 16, 1941

Docket28886.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 S.E.2d 40 (Padgett v. Padgett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Padgett v. Padgett, 13 S.E.2d 40, 64 Ga. App. 263, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 1 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

In this case a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $10,000 was returned. The defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled, and that judgment was assigned as error. The case is now pending in this court. Counsel of record for both parties have filed with the clerk of this court a written request that, for the purpose of facilitating a settlement of the case and ending the litigation, the judgment be reversed and a new trial granted, on the ground that the court erred in denying a new trial. We see no reason why the request should not be granted. Therefore the judgment is reversed. As a precedent for this ruling see E. Frederics Inc. v. Felton Beauty Supply Co., 62 Ga. App. 649 (9 S. E. 2d, 198).

Judgment reversed..

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

In this case a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $10,000 was returned. The defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled, and that judgment was assigned as error. The case is now pending in this court. Counsel of record for both parties have filed with the clerk of this court a written request that, for the purpose of facilitating a settlement of the case and ending the litigation, the judgment be reversed and a new trial granted, on the ground that the court erred in denying a new trial. We see no reason why the request should not be granted. Therefore the judgment is reversed. As a precedent for this ruling see E. Frederics Inc. v. Felton Beauty Supply Co., 62 Ga. App. 649 (9 S. E. 2d, 198).

Judgment reversed..

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 S.E.2d 40, 64 Ga. App. 263, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padgett-v-padgett-gactapp-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack