Padgett v. . McCoy

83 S.E. 756, 167 N.C. 508, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 157
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 16, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee CueiaM.

Tbe motion for a new trial in tbis case, because of newly discovered evidence, is denied. Tbe application is not witbin tbe rule applicable to sucb cases. Johnson v. R. R., 163 N. C., at page 453. Besides, it. is without real merit.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Padgett v. . McCoy, 83 S.E. 756, 167 N.C. 508, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 157 (N.C. 1914).

83 S.E. 756 (Padgett v. . McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexander v. Richmond Cedar Works
98 S.E. 780 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)