Padgett v. . McCoy

83 S.E. 756, 167 N.C. 508, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 157
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 16, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 83 S.E. 756 (Padgett v. . McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Padgett v. . McCoy, 83 S.E. 756, 167 N.C. 508, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 157 (N.C. 1914).

Opinion

Pee CueiaM.

Tbe motion for a new trial in tbis case, because of newly discovered evidence, is denied. Tbe application is not witbin tbe rule applicable to sucb cases. Johnson v. R. R., 163 N. C., at page 453. Besides, it. is without real merit.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander v. Richmond Cedar Works
98 S.E. 780 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.E. 756, 167 N.C. 508, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padgett-v-mccoy-nc-1914.