Padgett v. Hawkins

26 S.E. 608, 100 Ga. 93, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 575
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 17, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 26 S.E. 608 (Padgett v. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Padgett v. Hawkins, 26 S.E. 608, 100 Ga. 93, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 575 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The plaintiff having shown complete title in him- • self, and the defendants relying upon a sale under a tax execution, which was void for the reason stated in the case of Leonard v. Pilkinton, 99 Ga. 738, there was no error in directing a-verdict in the plaintiff’s favor for the premises in dispute, -and for mesne profits, it appearing that the amount of 'the latter, if allowable, had been fixed by an agreement between the counsel for the parties.

2. It is unnecessary to deal with the minor questions not affecting' the real merits of the case. Judgment affirmed.

E. P. Padgett, for plaintiffs in error, iG-. J. Holton- & Son, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leonard v. Pilkinton
27 S.E. 753 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 S.E. 608, 100 Ga. 93, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padgett-v-hawkins-ga-1896.