Paden v. State

86 S.E. 287, 17 Ga. App. 112, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 278
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 17, 1915
Docket6142
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 86 S.E. 287 (Paden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paden v. State, 86 S.E. 287, 17 Ga. App. 112, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 278 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

The newly discovered evidence offered in support of the motion for a new trial being of such a character as probably would cause a different result upon another investigation, the trial judge erred in overruling the motion. Although newly discovered evidence may be somewhat cumulative of testimony previously introduced, and impeaching in its character, the real ultimate criterion by which the merit of such testimony should be measured is the probability of a different result. Mitchell v. State, 6 Ga. App. 554 (4), 558 (65 S. E. 326); Nolan v. State, 14 Ga. App. 824 (82. S. E. 377), and citations.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stembridge v. State
65 S.E.2d 819 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Whitley v. State
54 S.E.2d 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
McDaniel v. State
38 S.E.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
North v. State
29 S.E.2d 923 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Cawthon v. State
16 S.E.2d 247 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Taylor v. State
4 S.E.2d 484 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Harper v. State
177 S.E. 886 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Hope v. Biggers
166 S.E. 686 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Gay v. Hurst
155 S.E. 346 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Todd v. Jackson
101 S.E. 192 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 S.E. 287, 17 Ga. App. 112, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paden-v-state-gactapp-1915.