Paden v. Cartledge
137 S. Ct. 170, 196 L. Ed. 2d 142, 85 U.S.L.W. 3144, 2016 WL 3570730, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 5703
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 3, 2016
DocketNo. 16–5056.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 137 S. Ct. 170 (Paden v. Cartledge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Paden v. Cartledge, 137 S. Ct. 170, 196 L. Ed. 2d 142, 85 U.S.L.W. 3144, 2016 WL 3570730, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 5703 (U.S. 2016).
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Paden v. State of South Carolina
D. South Carolina, 2020
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
137 S. Ct. 170, 196 L. Ed. 2d 142, 85 U.S.L.W. 3144, 2016 WL 3570730, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 5703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paden-v-cartledge-scotus-2016.