Padelford v. Hall

2 Mass. 149
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1806
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Mass. 149 (Padelford v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Padelford v. Hall, 2 Mass. 149 (Mass. 1806).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The endorsement must specially designate the character of the endorser, whether he be heir, legatee, or creditor, &c.

Sprout for the plaintiff. Tillinghast for the defendants.

The endorsement was amended by consent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Mass. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padelford-v-hall-mass-1806.