Padawer v. Zinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Padawer v. Zinberg

284 A.D. 990, 136 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4327

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D. 990 (Padawer v. Zinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Padawer v. Zinberg, 284 A.D. 990, 136 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4327 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff and by her father for medical expenses and loss of services, plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion (a) to vacate a prior order which deferred the trial to September 17, 1956, and (b) to restore the action to its normal place on the General Jury Calendar. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. The record discloses facts that appeared subsequent to the making of the order of deferment which, in the interests of justice, require restoration of the cause to the General Calendar. (Kings County Supreme Court Rules, rule 2, subd. [bb], par. [6].) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff and by her father for medical expenses and loss of services, plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion (a) to vacate a prior order which deferred the trial to September 17, 1956, and (b) to restore the action to its normal place on the General Jury Calendar. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. The record discloses facts that appeared subsequent to the making of the order of deferment which, in the interests of justice, require restoration of the cause to the General Calendar. (Kings County Supreme Court Rules, rule 2, subd. [bb], par. [6].) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D. 990, 136 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padawer-v-zinberg-nyappdiv-1954.