Padavan v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Padavan v. City of New York

291 A.D.2d 561, 738 N.Y.S.2d 249, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1980

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 25, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 291 A.D.2d 561 (Padavan v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Padavan v. City of New York, 291 A.D.2d 561, 738 N.Y.S.2d 249, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In a consolidated proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, (1) to prohibit the respondent St. John’s University from constructing a baseball stadium until an environmental impact statement is prepared, and (2) to review a determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, dated June 27, 2000, which, after a hearing, affirmed the granting of a building permit for the project, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), entered October 20, 2000, which, inter alia, denied the amended verified petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The petitioners seek to prohibit the construction of a baseball stadium on the campus of the respondent St. John’s University. Since the construction of the stadium has been completed, the appeal must be dismissed as academic. The appellants’ request to enjoin work on the project was denied by the Supreme Court. The appellants failed to move in this Court for a preliminary injunction to preserve the status quo pending the determination of this appeal. Thus, they failed to preserve their rights pending judicial review (see, Matter of Gorman v Town Bd. of Town of E. Hampton, 273 AD2d 235; Vanderwoude v Post / Rockland Assoc., 192 AD2d 702). S. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a consolidated proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, (1) to prohibit the respondent St. John’s University from constructing a baseball stadium until an environmental impact statement is prepared, and (2) to review a determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, dated June 27, 2000, which, after a hearing, affirmed the granting of a building permit for the project, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), entered October 20, 2000, which, inter alia, denied the amended verified petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The petitioners seek to prohibit the construction of a baseball stadium on the campus of the respondent St. John’s University. Since the construction of the stadium has been completed, the appeal must be dismissed as academic. The appellants’ request to enjoin work on the project was denied by the Supreme Court. The appellants failed to move in this Court for a preliminary injunction to preserve the status quo pending the determination of this appeal. Thus, they failed to preserve their rights pending judicial review (see, Matter of Gorman v Town Bd. of Town of E. Hampton, 273 AD2d 235; Vanderwoude v Post / Rockland Assoc., 192 AD2d 702). S. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 561, 738 N.Y.S.2d 249, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padavan-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack