Pacun v. Railway Express Agency
3 Misc. 2d 598, 146 N.Y.S.2d 543
This text of 3 Misc. 2d 598 (Pacun v. Railway Express Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pacun v. Railway Express Agency, 3 Misc. 2d 598, 146 N.Y.S.2d 543 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1955).
Opinions
There is nothing in the record to establish that the glassware was not already broken at the time it was delivered to defendant for shipment to New York City. “ Substantial justice has not been done between the parties ” (N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 185).
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Levins v. Bucholtz
208 Misc. 597 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Misc. 2d 598, 146 N.Y.S.2d 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacun-v-railway-express-agency-nysupct-1955.