Paco v. Myers
This text of Paco v. Myers (Paco v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 08-FEB-2019 01:43 PM
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
NATHAN PACO, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
MARY K. MYERS, dba MARY K. MYERS, Ph.D., dba Mary Myers, Ph.D., INC., aka MARY MYERS, TRUST, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 16-1-0842)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate
Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of
certiorari was filed, see Hawaii Revised Statutes § 602-59(a)
(2016); see also Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule
36(b)(1) (2016),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s application for
writ of certiorari, filed January 28, 2019, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule
40.1(a) (2017). (“The application shall be filed within 30 days
after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment
on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the
application is extended in accordance with this Rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, February 8, 2019.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paco v. Myers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paco-v-myers-haw-2019.