Pacmarine Products Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Pacmarine Products Co. v. United States

52 Cust. Ct. 232, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3858

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 8, 1964

DocketNo. 68221; protests 61/20163 and 62/8871 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 52 Cust. Ct. 232 (Pacmarine Products Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pacmarine Products Co. v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 232, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3858 (cusc 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the frozen pea pods in question, known in the food trade as “snow peas” or “sweet peas,” are the unripe state of those peas which, when ripe, are known, bought, and sold in the trade and commerce of the United States as edible-podded peas or sugar peas, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items covered by protest 61/20163, entered on September 1, 1959, at 1 cent per pound and the merchandise covered by protest 62/8871, entered on November 25,1959, at 2 cents per pound.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the frozen pea pods in question, known in the food trade as “snow peas” or “sweet peas,” are the unripe state of those peas which, when ripe, are known, bought, and sold in the trade and commerce of the United States as edible-podded peas or sugar peas, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items covered by protest 61/20163, entered on September 1, 1959, at 1 cent per pound and the merchandise covered by protest 62/8871, entered on November 25,1959, at 2 cents per pound.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Cust. Ct. 232, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacmarine-products-co-v-united-states-cusc-1964.