Packtor v. Seppala & AHO Construction Co.
640 A.2d 117, 229 Conn. 901, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 109
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 422 (AC 12089/12090), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“In the circumstances of this case, did the plaintiff state a cause of action under General Statutes §§ 29-389 and 29-391 even though he was not injured while attempting to escape a building during a fire or other similar emergency?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Packtor v. Seppala & AHO Construction Co., 640 A.2d 117, 229 Conn. 901, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 109 (Colo. 1994).
640 A.2d 117 (Packtor v. Seppala & AHO Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Packtor v. Seppala & AHO Construction Co.
650 A.2d 534 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)