Packer v. Louis De Jonge & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Packer v. Louis De Jonge & Co.

188 A.D. 926

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1919

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 188 A.D. 926 (Packer v. Louis De Jonge & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Packer v. Louis De Jonge & Co., 188 A.D. 926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order of the County Court of Richmond county reversed, and motion to vacate' order for appellant’s [927]*927examination granted, in accordance with decision in this matter, decided herewith. (Matter of Packer v. Hart, ante, p. 926.) One bill of costs only in this court for the two appeals. (Woodworth v. Brooklyn Elevated R. R. Co., 29 App. Div. 1,3.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Kelly and Jayeox, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order of the County Court of Richmond county reversed, and motion to vacate' order for appellant’s [927]*927examination granted, in accordance with decision in this matter, decided herewith. (Matter of Packer v. Hart, ante, p. 926.) One bill of costs only in this court for the two appeals. (Woodworth v. Brooklyn Elevated R. R. Co., 29 App. Div. 1,3.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Kelly and Jayeox, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 A.D. 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/packer-v-louis-de-jonge-co-nyappdiv-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack