Packard v. Town of Bovina
24 Wis. 382
Opinion
The judgment in this case must be affirmed. A town is not liable on an order drawn on its treasurer, until the order has been presented for payment,- and payment refused. It is like a bill of exchange or check. There is no default until the drawee has refused payment.
A demand being necessary, it would scarcely be insisted that a demand upon the treasurer’s boy, fourteen or fifteen years old, at the barn, and in the absence of the treasurer, was any demand upon him.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Packard v. Town of Bovina, 24 Wis. 382 (Wis. 1869).
24 Wis. 382 (Packard v. Town of Bovina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reichert v. Milwaukee County
150 N.W. 401 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1914)
Bigelow v. Town of Washburn
74 N.W. 362 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1898)
Schloss v. Board of Co. Commissioners
1 Colo. App. 145 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1891)
Schriber v. Town of Richmond
40 N.W. 644 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1888)