Pack v. Baltimore Police Department

Fourth Circuit

Pack v. Baltimore Police Department

250 F. App'x 560

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 15, 2007·No. No. 07-1731·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Pack appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint without prejudice for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Pack v. Baltimore Police Dep’t, No. 1:07-cv-01703-RDB (D.Md. July 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael Pack appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint without prejudice for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Pack v. Baltimore Police Dep’t, No. 1:07-cv-01703-RDB (D.Md. July 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Pack v. Baltimore Police Department, 250 F. App'x 560 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

250 F. App'x 560 (Pack v. Baltimore Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.