Pack v. Baltimore City Police Department

Fourth Circuit

Pack v. Baltimore City Police Department

371 F. App'x 447

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2010·No. No. 10-1058·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Pack appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pack v. Baltimore City Police Dep’t, No. 1:09-cv-03233-CCB (D.Md. Dec. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Pack appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pack v. Baltimore City Police Dep’t, No. 1:09-cv-03233-CCB (D.Md. Dec. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Pack v. Baltimore City Police Department, 371 F. App'x 447 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

371 F. App'x 447 (Pack v. Baltimore City Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related