Pacificorp v. Thomas

Ninth Circuit

Pacificorp v. Thomas

883 F.2d 661

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 8, 1988

DocketNos. 88-7184, 88-7231

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 883 F.2d 661 (Pacificorp v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pacificorp v. Thomas, 883 F.2d 661 (9th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Respondents’ motion to dismiss is granted. An EPA notice of violation is not reviewable because it is not a final agency action. See 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1983); Union Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 593 F.2d 299, 304-06 (8th Cir.1979); West Penn Power Co. v. Train, 522 F.2d 302, 310-11 (3d Cir.1975); see also Air California v. United States Department of Transportation, 654 F.2d 616, 620-21 (9th Cir.1981) (FAA letter warning of possible civil penalties not reviewable as non-final).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Respondents’ motion to dismiss is granted. An EPA notice of violation is not reviewable because it is not a final agency action. See 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1983); Union Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 593 F.2d 299, 304-06 (8th Cir.1979); West Penn Power Co. v. Train, 522 F.2d 302, 310-11 (3d Cir.1975); see also Air California v. United States Department of Transportation, 654 F.2d 616, 620-21 (9th Cir.1981) (FAA letter warning of possible civil penalties not reviewable as non-final).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

883 F.2d 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacificorp-v-thomas-ca9-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack