Pacificorp v. Thomas
883 F.2d 661
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 8, 1988·No. Nos. 88-7184, 88-7231·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Respondents’ motion to dismiss is granted. An EPA notice of violation is not reviewable because it is not a final agency action. See 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1983); Union Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 593 F.2d 299, 304-06 (8th Cir.1979); West Penn Power Co. v. Train, 522 F.2d 302, 310-11 (3d Cir.1975); see also Air California v. United States Department of Transportation, 654 F.2d 616, 620-21 (9th Cir.1981) (FAA letter warning of possible civil penalties not reviewable as non-final).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pacificorp v. Thomas, 883 F.2d 661 (9th Cir. 1988).
883 F.2d 661 (Pacificorp v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Luminant Generation Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
757 F.3d 439 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
Royster-Clark Agribusiness, Inc. v. Johnson
391 F. Supp. 2d 21 (District of Columbia, 2005)
Pacificorp, D/B/A Pacific Power & Light Company v. Lee Thomas, Administrator, Epa
883 F.2d 661 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)