Pacificare Inc., Dba Pacificare of California v. Vernon D. Martin Sherrie Sue Martin, and Scott Douglas Martin, a Minor

1 F.3d 963, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6230, 93 Daily Journal DAR 10725, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20975, 1993 WL 313578
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 20, 1993
Docket92-55476
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 F.3d 963 (Pacificare Inc., Dba Pacificare of California v. Vernon D. Martin Sherrie Sue Martin, and Scott Douglas Martin, a Minor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacificare Inc., Dba Pacificare of California v. Vernon D. Martin Sherrie Sue Martin, and Scott Douglas Martin, a Minor, 1 F.3d 963, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6230, 93 Daily Journal DAR 10725, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20975, 1993 WL 313578 (9th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

Submission of this case is deferred and the case is temporarily remanded.

Martin appealed from an order that left the amount of damages undetermined. Counsel for the parties stipulated before this court at oral argument that the amount of damages is an undisputed sum certain and that there are no remaining issues regarding damages. Specifically, the parties stipulated that Pacificare is entitled to full reimburse *964 ment plus prejudgment interest from an agreed time and at an agreed rate. We remand so that the district court can complete the ministerial task of entering an order assessing these damages. Cf. Parks v. Pavkovic, 753 F.2d 1397, 1401-02 (7th Cir. 1985) (where all that remains before the district court is the completion of a ministerial task, the order appealed from is a final judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1291).

We retain jurisdiction over this appeal during the pendency of the limited remand. The district court shall forward a copy of its supplemental order within thirty days from the date of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gold Coast Hotel and Casino v. United States
139 F.3d 904 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F.3d 963, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6230, 93 Daily Journal DAR 10725, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20975, 1993 WL 313578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacificare-inc-dba-pacificare-of-california-v-vernon-d-martin-sherrie-ca9-1993.