Pacific Union Club v. Palatine Ins. Co.
107 P. 705, 12 Cal. App. 515
Opinion
Appellant states in its opening brief that the facts in this case are identical with those in Pacific Union Club v.Commercial Union Assurance Company, ante, p. 503, [
Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.
Burnett, J., and Hart, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pacific Union Club v. Palatine Ins. Co., 107 P. 705, 12 Cal. App. 515 (Cal. Ct. App. 1910).
107 P. 705 (Pacific Union Club v. Palatine Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hammon v. American Exploration & Mining Co.
203 Cal. App. 2d 306 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
Heffernan v. Bennett & Armour
146 P.2d 482 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)
Blackman v. Sherman
105 P.2d 1000 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Turlock Theatre Co. v. Laws
86 P.2d 345 (California Supreme Court, 1939)
Kopke v. Carlson
276 P. 606 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
O'Gorman v. Wachter
235 P. 57 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)
Lefurgey v. Prentice
171 P. 1080 (California Court of Appeal, 1918)
Terry v. Rivergarden Farms Co.
154 P. 476 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)