Pacific Trading Co. v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 392, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1598
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pacific Trading Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Cust. Ct. 501
United States Customs Court·Decided October 29, 1952·No. No. 56918; protest 578567-G (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that a portion of the rice, namely, 2.2 percent thereof, consists of broken rice kernels which will pass readily through a metal sieve perforated with round holes five and one-half sixty-fourths of 1 inch in diameter the same as the broken rice involved [393]*393in Abstract 48704, the claim at five-eighths of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 727 was sustained. So-called “bonito or dried fish shavings,” stipulated to be similar to the hanakatsuo passed upon in Abstract 47026, was held dutiable at V/i cents per pound under paragraph 717 (c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pacific Trading Co. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 392, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1598 (cusc 1952).

29 Cust. Ct. 392 (Pacific Trading Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.