Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Corbett

23 F. Supp. 197, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2133
District Court, N.D. California·Decided May 4, 1938·No. No. 4067-R·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

The stipulation of facts filed herein supports the essential allegations of the bill of complaint.

The material, the storage use of which defendants seek to tax, consists (1) of specific order equipment, including central office switchboards, frames, switches, cables, wires, and other essential components of telephone and telegraph transmission; and (2) reserve or “stand-by” facilities of the sort just described which must be kept on hand in sufficient quantities to meet emergencies and new demands.

The principles governing the taxation of the use of this material are identical with those applicable in Southern Pacific Co. v. Corbett, D.C., 23 F.Supp. 193, filed May 3, 1938. For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case, we conclude that the bill herein must be dismissed.

We find the facts to be as stipulated and agreed by the parties. From those facts we conclude that the threatened enforcement of the California Use Tax Act, St.Cal. 1935, p. 1297, will not impose a direct or undue burden on plaintiff’s interstate commerce business.

The permanent injunction is denied and the bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Corbett, 23 F. Supp. 197, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2133 (N.D. Cal. 1938).

23 F. Supp. 197 (Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Corbett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Gallagher
306 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1939)