Pacific S. Home v. Protection Dist.

California Court of Appeal

Pacific S. Home v. Protection Dist.

193 P. 169, 49 Cal. App. 326, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 283

California Court of Appeal·Decided September 20, 1920·No. Civ. No. 3211.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In this action damages are sought for an alleged interference by the defendant with the natural flow of the waters of the Santa Ana River.

There was served and filed a third amended complaint, to which a general demurrer was interposed and sustained *Page 327 without leave to amend. No judgment was given, made, or entered. The attempted appeal is from the order sustaining the demurrer.

[1] Such an order, under our law, is not appealable. (Sec. 963, Code Civ. Proc.)

The attempted appeal is dismissed.

Finlayson, P. J., and Weller, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this action damages are sought for an alleged interference by the defendant with the natural flow of the waters of the Santa Ana River.

There was served and filed a third amended complaint, to which a general demurrer was interposed and sustained *Page 327 without leave to amend. No judgment was given, made, or entered. The attempted appeal is from the order sustaining the demurrer.

[1] Such an order, under our law, is not appealable. (Sec. 963, Code Civ. Proc.)

The attempted appeal is dismissed.

Finlayson, P. J., and Weller, J., concurred.

Pacific S. Home v. Protection Dist., 193 P. 169, 49 Cal. App. 326, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 283 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

193 P. 169 (Pacific S. Home v. Protection Dist.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related