Pacific Rivers Council v. Usfs

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 29, 2013
Docket08-17565
StatusPublished

This text of Pacific Rivers Council v. Usfs (Pacific Rivers Council v. Usfs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacific Rivers Council v. Usfs, (9th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PACIFIC RIVERS COUNCIL, No. 08-17565 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:05-cv-00953- MCE-GGH UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; MARK REY, in his official capacity as Under Secretary of Agriculture; ORDER DALE BOSWORTH, in his capacity as Chief of the United States Forest Service; JACK BLACKWELL, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, Region 5, United States Forest Service, Defendants-Appellees,

and

CALIFORNIA FORESTRY ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION; QUINCY LIBRARY GROUP; PLUMAS COUNTY; CALIFORNIA SKI INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, Defendant-intervenors-Appellees. 2 PACIFIC RIVERS COUNCIL V. USFS

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed July 29, 2013

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, William A. Fletcher, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to the June 17, 2013, order of the Supreme Court, we remand this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California with instructions to dismiss the case as moot in its entirety.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pacific Rivers Council v. Usfs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-rivers-council-v-usfs-ca9-2013.