Pacific Raw Materials Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Pacific Raw Materials Corp. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 402, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1815

United States Customs Court·Decided February 3, 1954·No. No. 57834; protest 213637-K (B) (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in O. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in O. D. 1480, supra.

Pacific Raw Materials Corp. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 402, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1815 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

32 Cust. Ct. 402 (Pacific Raw Materials Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related